How Opposing Transgender Athletes Hurts All of Us
How Opposing Transgender Athletes Hurts All of Us
In several states, legislators have introduced bills
to ban transgender girls from competing on girls’ and women’s sports teams in
public high schools and universities. They claim the reason for these bills is
to protect cisgender girls and women, who identify as the gender they were
assigned at birth. But, it’s not true. These laws will only hurt cisgender
people.
Now, don’t get me wrong. The most important reason to
support trans athletes is to support trans athletes and trans rights, in
general. But, if you don’t care about trans people, maybe you’ll care about how
these bills damage cis people.
With that in mind, I’m not going to explain about the
gender affirming hormones that many trans women take and how they significantly
reduce muscle mass as well as red-blood cells that carry oxygen to the muscles
to enhance performance. These hormones also reduce speed and strength. Many
young trans girls take puberty blockers that inhibit the initial growth of
muscle mass, so they are not actually bigger and stronger than cis girls.
I won’t point out that people come in all different
shapes and sizes regardless of their genitalia. I happen to be 5’10”, which
makes me, a cis female, 2” taller than the average male, and I’m no unicorn. I
have known many cis women taller than me.
It’s not worth mentioning that many female athletes
have higher testosterone levels than non-athletes. Testosterone levels in men
range from 10–25 nmol/L, and studies show these levels do not directly
correlate with athleticism.
I won’t bother to pontificate on the studies that show
that trans female athletes do better when training in the same manner as cis
women, and trans male athletes tend to do better when training in the same
manner as cis men, indicating that gender is more in the brain than in the
genitals.
I’m not going to talk about the Associated Press
interviews of a dozen lawmakers sponsoring these bills. How they only knew of
the same few occasions where it had been an issue, out of hundreds of thousands
of teenage girls who play sports. Which makes sense since surveys show that
.06% of Americans identify as transgender. Only about half of that percentage
will play sports in high school and fewer in college. Most athletes will never
play against a transgender person.
It’s probably not worth mentioning that California has
protected the rights of transgender students to play sports among the gender
they identify with for the last eight years with no major complaints or issues.
I won’t tell you about these things, because you’ve
probably already made up your mind that trans women are really just men in
dresses. So, if you’re still with me, let me explain how your intention to
protect cis girls and women by banning trans girls and women from school sports
will backfire.
By claiming that trans girls and women have an unfair advantage over cis girls and women you are telling everyone, AGAIN, that people with vaginas are not good enough. You are telling us that we are weak, fragile and insufficient.
I was an uncoordinated child in an athletic family. I
have one sister and one brother and the two of them were probably equal in
strength and coordination. I have a minor disability that affected my
coordination, so I was never very good at team sports. I was strong and had
great endurance, so I was a good skier, swimmer and runner. I was better at the
solitary sports.
Because of my lack of coordination I struggled in
social situations where games were played. I fought to defy the image of being
a stereo-typical ‘girl’. There were plenty of strong girls around me, and I
felt weak and frail. I was ashamed because I made girls look bad by fitting the
stereotype. It damaged my self-esteem in ways that took me decades to overcome.
I still struggle with it. And this debate about trans athletes has brought it
all back, front and center in my mind.
In my twenties, I took a six year old girl and her
friend to the mall. They wanted to go to the arcade. The first game we saw as
we walked through the door was a machine to test strength. There were
categories to mark how strong a person is. Strongest was Superman. Towards the
bottom were Wimp and Weakling and the lowest category was Girl.
The six year olds weren’t very strong and couldn’t get
above the lowest category.
I stood there listening to them tease each other.
“You’re a girl!”
“No, you’re a girl!”
My heart broke for them because I knew too well the
stigma they would have to overcome by learning that the label ‘girl’ is an
insult. That being a girl is worse than being a wimp or a weakling.
By opposing trans athletes, you’re not only telling
cis girls and women that they aren’t good enough to compete, you’re telling
boys and men that women aren’t good enough. You’re reinforcing the agenda for
women to work lower paid jobs and have fewer benefits and opportunities than
men. You’re reinforcing a culture that makes women submissive to men.
Stop telling girls and women that we aren’t good
enough!!! JUST STOP IT!
It’s true that men on average tend to have 40–60% more
upper body strength and 25–30% more lower body strength, but female power
lifters, through proper training and diet have lowered that ratio to 0–8%.
Even though there is some correlation between muscle
mass and strength there is plenty of evidence that there are other factors that
impact an athlete’s abilities, such as genetics and muscle and bone length.
Studies have even shown that women, with less lower body strength, have
outperformed men in leg presses.
In endurance sports, women excel far beyond men. In
the 2003 Boston Marathon, the average times for women were five times faster
than the average times for men. Alaska’s Iditarod dog-sled race is frequently
won by women whose endurance and higher body fat play an important role. Higher
body fat also makes women better swimmers by making them more buoyant with less
drag.
If your real agenda is protecting girl and women athletes from unfair advantage then it might interest you to know that even though girls’ opportunities to play in sports have increased since the 1970s, boys still have 1.13 million more sporting opportunities every year than girls.
Researchers found in studies of small children
learning to play tee-ball, that coaches and parents gave extra attention to
boys, giving them pointers and encouragement, leaving the girls to figure it
out on their own or simply fail.
In 2018, a Neilsen report showed that only 4% of total
commercial investment in sports goes into women’s sports, despite 84% of sports
fans expressing an interest.
If you really want to ensure that women have a
valuable experience in sports, then your time and energy would be better spent
making sure they have more opportunities and better media attention. Making
sure equal money is given to girl’s athletic camps and school sports as to
boy’s. Put your passion into supporting all girls and women, not into tearing
down a small subset of them just because you don’t understand them.
The social impact of sports on young women is
undeniable. Study after study proves women’s confidence, earnings potential,
and even their tendency to leave a violent domestic situation goes up along
with participation in sports.
School sports is not supposed to be about competition
and exclusivity, it is supposed to be about being a team, about inclusivity,
diversity and fun! Sports are a way to gain a feeling of belonging, as well as
to build physical health and reduce stress. If you truly support girls and
women in sports, please stop opposing trans people’s right to play as the
gender they identify with. They are not hurting girl and women athletes. You
are.